| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT 
Health care financing is a worldwide issue that affects all governments, including those in 
developed  countries.  In  third-world  countries  with  faltering  economies  and  competing 
demands  for  financial  resources,  the  problem  is  exacerbated.  This  has  had  an  impact  on 
citizens' healthcare access. In Kenya, there has been a scarcity of research to inform policy 
formation and practices in healthcare funding. The focus of this thesis was on Meru County's 
Direct Government Health Funds. The study's  major goal was to determine the impact  of 
direct government health funds on service delivery in Meru County's basic primary health 
facilities, because of the significant diversity of distribution, the study area it was excellent 
for the investigation. The study aimed to draw concrete conclusions about the study's main 
objectives.  Determine  the  quantity  of  funds  received  and  their  impact  on  primary  health 
facilities service  delivery.  To  determine  the  impact  of  existing  funding  modalities  on 
primary  health  facilities service  delivery.  To  determine  the  impact  of  health  facility 
committee functionality on service delivery in primary health facilities. Statistical Packages 
for  Social  Scientists  was used  to  analyze  the  data  (SPSS  Version  28)  to  assess  the 
interrelationship between the study case variables, descriptive and inferential statistics were 
used. In this study, multiple regressions and bivariate logistic analyses were used to analyze 
the relationship between the study variables. The study discovered and concluded that the 
amount of funds, funding modalities, and the influence of the health management committee 
had a significant impact on service delivery in primary health care institutions. The R value 
represented  how  the  independent  variables  in  the  study  influenced  56  percent  of  service 
delivery at primary  health facilities. The results showed that the government health funds 
had  a  positive  impact  in  service  delivery  at  primary  health  facilities.  With  a  significance 
value of 0.001 and 0.002, respectively, at a 95% level of significance, the amount of funds 
and  funding  mechanisms  had  the  greatest  impact  on  service  delivery.  Furthermore,  the 
significant value of the health management committee's influence was 0.004. The 
government  funding  had  aided  health  facilities  in  Buuri  in  becoming  more  effective  and 
delivering  services  to  a  larger  population.  The  study  recommends  that,  more  government 
funds should be allocated to aid primary health facilities, facilities should have plans in place 
for how they would use the allocated funds, more community involvement in the 
management of the facilities, more training and seminars. | en_US |